Is DOGE Part of US National Security? - A Key Metric to Watch

Video:

Visit Rumble Link

Take our online poll:

AI Analysis:

Over the past 400 years, several major global powers have experienced declines in their leadership roles, often influenced by the burden of government debt. Here are notable instances where interest payments on national debt became substantial:

These examples illustrate how escalating interest payments on national debt can constrain military spending and contribute to a nation's decline as a global leader.

  1. Spanish Empire (1600s - early 1700s) - Context: Spain was the dominant global power in the 16th century, but by the 17th century, the empire was crippled by debt. Debt vs Military: Spain took on massive loans to fund wars (especially the Eighty Years' War and conflicts with France and England). By the mid-1600s, debt interest was absorbing such a large share of revenue that military budgets were slashed. Consequence: Spain’s military and naval decline followed, and Spain lost its preeminent global position to the Dutch, French, and eventually the British.

  2. French Monarchy (1700s - pre-Revolution) - Context: France under Louis XIV and Louis XVI accumulated enormous war debts, particularly from wars against Britain and participation in the American Revolution. Debt vs Military: By the late 1780s, debt service consumed over 50% of the French budget — far exceeding military spending. Consequence: The inability to finance reforms or maintain military readiness played a key role in the economic crisis leading to the French Revolution, which shattered France’s global dominance.

  3. Ottoman Empire (1800s) - Context: The Ottoman Empire borrowed heavily to modernize and fund wars, especially in Crimea and against European powers. Debt vs Military: By the late 1800s, interest payments on foreign debt consumed such a large portion of revenue that the military budget was heavily constrained. Consequence: The empire was forced into external debt restructuring via the Ottoman Public Debt Administration (1881), which severely limited its economic sovereignty and ability to fund its military, accelerating its decline as a global power.

  4. Dutch Republic (Early 18th Century): Following the War of the Spanish Succession, the Dutch Republic's public debt soared from 38 million guilders in 1678 to 128 million guilders by 1713. The debt service consumed almost all normal tax revenue, leading to significant reductions in military expenditures. Consequently, the Republic voluntarily resigned as a Great Power, adopting a policy of neutrality and reducing its army from 130,000 in 1713 to 40,000 by 1715.

  5. Habsburg Austria (1800s - Early 1900s) - Context: The Habsburg Empire’s costly wars with Prussia, France, and later Italy, plus the need to modernize its economy, led to growing debt. Debt vs Military: By the late 1800s, Austria-Hungary faced crippling debt service costs, especially after losing revenue from breakaway territories. Consequence: Military spending was limited, and the empire’s inability to project power contributed to its diminishing influence before its collapse in WWI.

  6. Russian Empire (1900s - Pre-Revolution) - Context: The Tsarist regime financed military expansion, industrialization, and war (especially the Russo-Japanese War and WWI) through borrowing. Debt vs Military: By 1916-1917, debt interest consumed a larger share of revenue than military operations. Consequence: Russia’s fiscal collapse, alongside military defeats, directly contributed to the 1917 Revolutions and the fall of the Russian Empire.

  7. Italy (Post-World War I) - Context: Italy’s massive debt after World War I, combined with the costs of maintaining colonial ambitions and modernization, strained its finances. Debt vs Military: By the 1920s, debt service often exceeded military spending, curtailing Italy’s ability to project global power. Consequence: Italy's reduced military capacity and fiscal strain contributed to its weaker position in World War II.

  8. The Soviet Union (1980s - 1991) - Context: Although the USSR was more insulated from external borrowing, its internal debt (including unpaid obligations to allies, over-investment in military R&D, and unsustainable subsidies) grew sharply. Debt vs Military: By the late 1980s, implicit debt service (economic inefficiencies tied to military spending) was effectively constraining the Soviet economy. Consequence: The Soviet economy could no longer sustain global competition, contributing to the USSR’s collapse in 1991.

Across history, when great powers prioritize debt service over military capacity, they often lose their ability to project power globally. Whether in monarchies, empires, or modern states, the link between fiscal strain, reduced military readiness, and declining global influence is a recurring pattern.

Chart:

Interest Payments vs Military Spending

References:

The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers

Comments